Showing posts with label Samantha Storms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samantha Storms. Show all posts

Thursday, July 4, 2019

"Witch Hunts, Weapons & The Enemy Within" by Matthew Mayer




 I. Fear - /ˈfir/ (noun) – an unpleasant often strong emotion caused by anticipation or awareness of danger  (“Fear”)



Nelson Mandela once said, “I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear” (“19 Quotes”). In the society of the modern world, we drown in a massive swimming pool of “consumption and fear” (Moore, 47:31), one where it seems there is no guard on duty. Fear is internal, but I believe it transposes externally, as we find ourselves in situations where police officers around the country are unlawfully shooting African-Americans or where we believe our president is going to run the United States of America - or the world - into the ground. Every single human being on the planet is instilled with fear, but it is quite clear that the degrees of which they do fear vary across the map. If there is something to be said about the characters of Lena Wertmüller’s 1974 film, Swept Away, it would be that they, too, lay in the swimming pool of fear. That is until they find an island.



Swept Away is the story of a capitalist woman and her Communist servant, who, after deciding to hop off of their yacht, find themselves stuck on a dinghy in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea. Eventually, they float their way to a deserted island, where they have to fend for their lives, but throughout the entirety of the film, we see a strong confliction between the two. Serving as a juxtaposition of wealthy versus poor, beautiful versus ugly, and the Left versus the Right, the film teaches viewers about people and their interactions toward one another. To that end, Swept Away embodies what happens when one thing takes control of our power: fear.


When it comes to artists and their works’ themes, Lena Wertmüller was not the only creator to use the idea of fear as a paintbrush. Over the course of their forty-plus year legacy, Rush wrote many bewildering, yet bewitching tunes. Through drummer Neil Peart’s captivating lyrics, the Canadian prog-rock trio’s music provides audiences a medium to not only engage with, but one to also connect with.



Over the span of three albums, Peart wrote a lyric trilogy entitled, “Fear.” Constructed in a reverse-chronological order, the band formed compositions that captivated how the world perceives and drives fear. By utilizing the Fear trilogy as a set of lenses, one can analyze and compare the ideas expressed by both Lena Wertmüller and Neil Peart.



II. The Enemy Within

“I’m not giving in to security under pressure, I’m not missing out on the promise of adventure, I’m not giving up on implausible dreams, Experience to extremes, Experience to extremes”

 - Rush’s “The Enemy Within (Part I of Fear)” - Grace Under Pressure (1984)



Throughout the film, it is quite plain sailing to infer from Gennarino’s body language that he deals with his own insecurities, his own “enemy within.” The five fears imbedded in the servant’s system include (but are not limited to) the fear of the lack of nobility, the fear of ostracization, the fear of being unloved, the fear of the refusal of power and dominance, and the fear of reality. Through his perceptions and actions, we, as an audience, can get a better picture of the consequences of fear from humanity.





To Gennarino, the threat of lacking nobility is haunting. As Samantha Storms writes in her essay about the comparisons of Nicolas Roeg’s film, Walkabout, and Wertmüller’s Swept Away, the “daunting weight that exists between” the characters is their “status,” and Gennarino understands that his own status will keep him out of his favorable role in society (Storms, par. 2). Deep down, Gennarino does not want to be a servant for some rich, bossy woman. Why would he? Why would anyone? His position as someone else’s “slave” keeps him from being noble in any way, and after he finds a way to exert his own power, the tables turn.



When the “blonde beauty” and the “brunette beast” reach the deserted island aboard their dinghy, Gennarino begins exerting his power and dominance on Raffaella. This first becomes evident when he forces her to call him “Signor Carunchio” (Wertmüller 54:06) and tells her to “kiss your master’s hand” (Wertmüller 59:45). Furthermore, Gennarino starts to beat Raffaella for the societal problems caused solely because of the wealthy class. Issues like “inflation,” “not paying taxes,” raising the prices on food, fares, and gas, and miscellaneous taxes are his reasoning for slapping and punching his former mistress, and shortly thereafter, he begins to rape the innocent woman (Wertmüller 1:09:17). At first, Raffaella refuses to be exercised under the power of somebody else, but over time, she comes to learn that her obedience is imperative to her survival; without the first, she will not receive the latter. Because of all of the treatment that she had put him through on the yacht, Gennarino is afraid that she will not obey him in order to suffer the equal (if not worse) amount of “pain” and torture. In terms of their new status, the server has now become the served, and the served has become the server; as Gennarino states, “I would like a little service. It’s my turn; that’s life” (Wertmüller 1:03:30).



Throughout Swept Away, there are many instances where Gennarino expresses fear when he is not being loved by Raffaella. Towards the end of the film, the “egocentric Neanderthal” (Storms, par. 5) tells Raffaella that he needs “proof” of her love, with her responding that he is “all that (she) wants” (Wertmüller 1:38:02). This scene reveals the irony in Gennarino’s character because he tells her to “Admit you’re scared”, but in the end, it is quite obvious that he is the fearful one; he knows that he will never be good enough for her whether she says so or not. Also, in the closing scene where the beauty and the beast discuss their fate, Gennarino’s tone is diluted with sappiness and fright when he pins Raffaella by stating, “Unless you’ve changed your mind already” (Wertmüller 1:45:33). He knows that she never loved him to begin with, just as much as the viewer knows it, and it can be argued that she was under a spell of “Stockholm Syndrome” (Farajollah, par. 1). However, as he tries his best to keep Rafaella interested in him and him only, Gennarino does not want to come to the realization that he is not loved. He is not alone; in a sense, we all have that fear of being unwanted, a fear of reality. However, in Swept Away, the difference between life on a remote island and life back on land is a catastrophe in the mind of the beast.



Three-quarters of the way into the film, Raffaella informs her “master” that she refused to call for help from a passing boat because she had been “swept away into a mad dream” (Wertmüller 1:26:28). Instead of being grateful for her love and “commitment,” he decides to physically abuse her because, deep down, he is afraid of the return to the real world, the return of reality. Gennarino knows that it is home where he cannot exert the same power and control as freely as he can on the island towards Raffaella. When he does return to the land, he is greeted by hugs and affection from his wife, but he pushes her away, exclaiming, “It makes a man look foolish to have his wife follow him around,” (Wertmüller 1:40:49). Not only does he refuse to accept the reality of the situation, but he also is afraid of being ostracized - the final fear.



Like many of us, Gennarino fears ostracization, as he wants to have a sense of belonging. However, as the servant of a wealthy class of sea-traveling vacationers, he is refused a place in their society.  Even though he is avoiding ostracization himself, Gennarino is undoubtedly ostracizing others; in the final scene, he is greeted by his wife, but he rejects her affection and pushes her away, which is accentuated when he vocalizes, “That’s enough. Stop!” (Wertmüller 1:40:33). In terms of his character, there are certainly many other fears and examples, and even the samples mentioned are interchangable. However, I think it is certain that these are the most impacting not only to himself, but also in regards to the treatment of others, specifically Raffaella.



The actions and insecurities of Gennarino coincide with the lyrics of Rush, especially those from the song, “The Enemy Within.” As mentioned previously, there exists an enemy within Gennarino, just as there lives one inside all of us. However, as far as his composition, Neil Peart writes, “Experience to extreme” (Rush, “The Enemy Within”), and in terms of the film and his character, Gennarino utilizes the need for power as an experience, one in which he takes to the extreme. When he brutally abuses and rapes Raffaella, it becomes quite clear that the beast is most certainly “not missing out on the promise of adventure” (Rush, “The Enemy Within”). It might not seem so obvious right away, but any experience can be taken to its extreme. However, in Swept Away, the struggle with fear is taken a step further, where Gennarino weaponizes his resources and power against Raffaella.



III. The Weapon

“We’ve got nothing to fear but fear itself; Not pain or failure, not fatal tragedy, not the faulty units in this mad machinery, not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry;

And the things that we fear are a weapon to be held against us”

- Rush’s “The Weapon (Part II of Fear)” - Signals (1982)



 From the get-go, the characters of Swept Away pull the trigger on each other. Both Gennarino and Raffaella weaponize each other throughout the film, sometimes more apparent than others and often under different circumstances. By taking metaphysical compositions and turning them into artillery, Gennarino and Raffaella hurt each other - mentally and physically - with what means the most to them.





Throughout the course of their journeys, the beauty and the beast beat each other around with their talks of political beliefs. With the mix of Gennarino’s communist views and Raffaella’s capitalist beliefs, there is often hostility and aggression between the two. For example, in the scene where “the master” physically abuses his “servant” because of the wrongdoings of the rich, Gennarino weaponizes politics as a way of giving reason to hurt someone else (Wertmüller 1:09:17). Also, in the very beginning of the film, Raffaella argues the ways of the government with another man aboard the yacht, and although she does not physically harm him, she is still attempting to criticize another person because of their beliefs (Wertmüller 4:02). Even today, we see this same style of weaponization, specifically with the opposing political beliefs of conservatives and liberals. If one is a fan of Donald Trump, they are seen as a “racist”, a “sexist”, or simply “evil”, but if another is against the ways of the president, they may be viewed as “spiteful” or “ignorant” (Hart, par. 8). In a world as divided as the one we live in today, we find ourselves getting further and further from what we strive to achieve: equality. Politics is just one of the many resources used to weaponize one another both inside and outside the world of the film.



Since the dawn of man, humans have been using sex as a tool and resource of pleasure and reproduction. However, over the course of several thousands of years, the dangerous species of man has found ways of weaponizing sex not only for their own pleasure, but also for the dehumanization of others. From the recent abuse cases of Harvey Weinstein to the practice of “sexual violence as a weapon of war and genocide” (“Sexual,” par. 1), the use and misuse of sex has become a concurrent activity that seems may never face its own fate.



In Swept Away, it is evident where the misuse of sex is present. After Gennarino beats the rich’s faults out of Raffaella, he proceeds to declothe and rape her - throwing her panties into the wind, along with his humanity. If the sexual abuse was not enough for him, Gennarino proceeds to belittle Raffaella by stating, “You’re finally going to know a real man. You’ve never had one before,” (Wertmüller 1:10:56). Later in the film, he degrades what many believe to be is the most precious thing to a female, the “coin of sexual purity” (Lindstend, par. 3): a girl’s virginity. Gennarino becomes offended that he was not Raffaella’s first romantic companion, so as a form of humiliation, he weaponizes her previous “partners” to make her feel like a “whore,” as he calls her (Wertmüller 1:19:34). This mockery through sex only adapts from the most important and potent weapon: power.



From the yacht to the island, Raffaella and Gennarino exert their own power towards each other. In the beginning of the film, the capitalist makes a fool out of her communist servant because he served her “reheated coffee” (Wertmüller 8:31) and “overcooked” pasta (Wertmüller 12:50). Here, it is not the pasta or the coffee that is the problem, it is their status and positions of power (or lack thereof); the goods only serve as a catalyst for the forthcoming events. In spite and revenge, Gennarino begins his own quest for power, but it is only once they reach the deserted island that he has his chance.



One could argue that it is Raffaella who is the alpha male in the film, but when their trip relies on survival skills and strength, it is quite apparent that the only one with power is Gennarino. Because of this, the beast uses his dominance to exert physical power and brute strength against the helpless beauty. Many of the instances have been previously mentioned, like the kissing of the master’s hand, the addressing as “Signor Carunchio”, and the request for “a little service” (Wertmüller 1:03:30). However, as a whole, Gennarino uses his power and dominance to not only physically harm Raffaella, as both a slave of labor and a “slave of love” (Wertmüller 1:12:45), but he also damages her mentally and emotionally. With a lack of resources and strength, the blonde beauty, likely suffering from “Stockholm Syndrome,” as mentioned before, has to abide to the ways of her new master, only until she gets the last laugh in the end (Farajollah, par. 1).



Because of his power to refuse resources, Gennarino often weaponizes food and shelter as a way of getting his own compensation, which is anything from affection to appreciation. After they find a place to rest, Gennarino prohibits Raffaella from entering the hut, ordering her to freeze outside during the remainder of the night (Wertmüller 55:30). Only shortly thereafter, the beast refuses to feed the beauty, stating, “If you want to eat, you must work,” (Wertmüller 59:22). By weaponizing basic resources, Gennarino not only endangers Raffaella, but he also creates a division between the two, one where, as mentioned before, the tables flip.



Much like all of the fears, Gennarino’s weapons are not limited and they are interchangeable. Without the power and dominance, he would not be able to acquire the sex, just as if he were unable to hunt for food and water, he would not be able to empower the blonde beauty. Gennarino, himself, is a weapon. He stands as the predator refusing to let any boundary get in the way, pulling the trigger with every ounce of power possible. And in terms of Raffaella, she is the target. She is the prey, fearful of the weapons “to be held against” her (Rush, “The Weapon”). However, in the end, as Neil Peart puts it, we really do have “nothing to fear but fear itself” (Rush, “The Weapon”).



IV. Witch Hunt

“The righteous rise with burning eyes of hatred and ill-will. Mad men feed on fear and lies to beat and burn and kill; Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand.

Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand.”

 - Rush’s “Witch Hunt (Part III of Fear)” - Moving Pictures (1981)







When Geddy Lee’s soaring voice roars to exclaim, “and fear walk hand in hand,” my hair raises and goosebumps are sent all over my body. There is something so powerful and truthful about the lyrics in “Witch Hunt” that every human can relate to because we are all guilty of premature frustration and criticization, and in those cases, we often do not take a moment to grasp what the circumstances are, whether it is the homeless fellow laying in the subway begging for a buck or it is the student wearing hand-me-downs because they are unable to afford the “cool” clothes. Walking down the streets of cities, like New York and Philadelphia, it becomes scarce to find another individual that is alike to another, and we often do not appreciate each other for our individuality and uniqueness. In Swept Away, there is no appreciation for one another, as both Gennarino and Raffaella follow the same footsteps as Neil Peart’s lyrical subject(s).



From start to finish, there is a constant sense of critique between Gennarino and Raffaella. In the beginning, we hear the beauty calling out her wealthy traveling companions and their political views (Wertmüller 4:24), and throughout her journeys on and off of the yacht, she is constantly judging others because of their lack of wealth and nobility. In terms of Peart’s words, Raffaella serves as “the righteous”, as she “rises” with power and looks down in dismay at those who she deems are not of her kind (Rush, “Witch Hunt”). However, glancing up at the righteous while simultaneously peering down at those that are not his kind, there lays Gennarino.



As far as Gennarino goes, he criticizes others, but in his case, he chooses to reprimand the wealthy, specifically Raffaella. In a scene where he is sexually assaulting his “sex slave,” Gennarino starts to assume that not only are the rich a class of “perverts” and “pigs,” but he also speculates that Raffaella has cheated on her husband, questioning whether or not it was “three hundred or six hundred times” (Wertmüller 1:19:25). By fitting her into a stereotype, the beast is degrading her individuality and feeding on “fear and lies to beat and burn and kill” (Rush, “Witch Hunt”). The wealthy and the poor judge alike, but as with anyone, fear is the stimulant that is driving us all down the wrong road.





V. “The Age of Fear”



In his article published by Rolling Stone magazine entitled “Why We’re Living in the Age of Fear,” writer Neil Strauss talks about the impact and potency of fear. Even though we exist in “the safest time in human history,” we are simultaneously “living in the most fearmongering time in human history,” according to Barry Glassner, the president of Lewis & Clark College and the author of The Culture of Fear (Strauss, par. 12).



Lindsay Knight states it best: Swept Away is “Wertmüller’s own call of action to humanity” (Knight, par. 9). In her mind, the film is voicing that if we do not punish predators and help victims “regain their freedom”, then we are just “accomplices in the recurring abuse cycle” (Knight, par. 9). The film says, “Yeah, it is scary to understand that there are evil people out there in the world. Here is a little fear of reality. So, what are you doing to do about it?” In today’s society, women - and, sometimes, men - have to fear for their lives from physical and sexual abusers, domestically or otherwise. In the film, the power that Gennarino exerts towards Raffaella should be a wake-up call, and it should make the viewer fearful both in the world of the film and the world of reality. However, there’s only one way to overcome fear: we have to face it.



According to Dr. Noam Shpancer, a specialist in insight therapy, “Exposure is by far the most potent medicine known to psychology” (Shpancer, par. 7). By facing our fears, we learn to deal with the possibilities instead of become more anxious from them, and as a result, we gain a “sense of accomplishment and empowerment” (Shpancer, par. 10), as well as a development of “skill and mastery” (Shpancer, par. 11). If we continue to avoid our fears, then we will continue to drown in the swimming pool of fear, but until then, it’s time to take off our floaties and ride the waves without allowing them to crash upon us.



In terms of humanity, fear is infinite. It is a “disease” waiting to be metaphysically infused into every single one of us, and it is a weapon pointing at society, its target (Strauss, par. 4). The only time that we will never live in fear is the time that we will not be living, and when we open our eyes more and more to the dangers of society and humanity, we start to fear fear. However, until our fate comes and the human race is no longer standing, generation after generation will soak in the same bath and spread the bug that is...fear.

the author (left) with  Jan Harlan, Stanley Kubrick's producer




Works Cited:



“19 Quotes About Facing Your Fears.” SUCCESS, Success Magazine, 31 July 2018, www.success.com/19-quotes-about-facing-your-fears/.

Moore, Michael, director. Bowling for Columbine. United Artists, 2002.

Farajollah, Ariana. “An Abused Woman’s Colonization and Declaration of Independence in SWEPT AWAY.” Taking Giant Steps, Giant Steps Press, 7 June 2017, giantstepspress.blogspot.com/search?q=swept away.

“Fear.” Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fear.

Hart, Kim. “Poll: Majority of Democrats Think Republicans Are ‘Racist," ‘Bigoted’ or ‘Sexist.’” Axios, 12 Nov. 2018, www.axios.com/poll-democrats-and-republicans-hate-each-other-racist-ignorant-evil-99ae7afc-5a51-42be-8ee2-3959e43ce320.html.

Knight, Lindsay. “‘Swept Away’: An Illusion of Affection Stretched Too Thin.” Taking Giant Steps, Giant Steps Press, 18 Oct. 2018, giantstepspress.blogspot.com/search?q=swept away.

Lindsted, Kjeld. “The Value Placed On Virginity Is One Of History's Biggest Travesties.” Mic, Mic Network Inc., 26 Oct. 2015, mic.com/articles/54313/the-value-placed-on-virginity-is-one-of-history-s-biggest-travesties#.1cfcamG6H.

Rush. “Witch Hunt.” Moving Pictures, Terry Brown, Le Studio, Quebec, 1980.

Rush. “The Weapon.” Signals, Terry Brown, Le Studio, Quebec, 1982.

Rush. “The Enemy Within.” Grace Under Pressure, Peter Henderson, Le Studio, Quebec, 1983.

“Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War and Genocide.” Facing History and Ourselves, www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/video/sexual-violence-weapon-war-and-genocide.

Shpancer, Noam. “Overcoming Fear: The Only Way Out Is Through.” Psychology Today, Sussex Publishers, 20 Sept. 2010, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/insight-therapy/201009/overcoming-fear-the-only-way-out-is-through.

Storms, Samantha. “Passion’s Dark Side: Roeg’s WALKABOUT vs Wertmüller’s SWEPT AWAY.” Taking Giant Steps, Giant Steps Press, 8 Dec. 2016, giantstepspress.blogspot.com/search?q=swept away.

Strauss, Neil. “Why We're Living in the Age of Fear.” Rolling Stone, 25 June 2018, www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/why-were-living-in-the-age-of-fear-190818/.

Wertmüller, Lena, director. Swept Away. YouTube, Medusa Distribuzione, 1974, www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzAEF5g35uw&t=4775s.

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Horribly Evocative, Grossly Inspiring: All Too “Swept Away” by Sofie Ramirez




Horribly evocative---these are the words I first used to describe Lina Wertmuller’s Swept Away. Watching the film elicited a very harsh emotional reaction and evoked some painful memories that I would have rather avoided, but Swept Away was created for that very reason. What I once took as the romanticization of a horrible issue was actually the opposite; Wertmuller made this film so that people could no longer hide in the silence of issues such as sexual abuse and rape. It feels as though she had accessed all of these negative feelings for the sake of change so that, instead of staying trapped in fear, I felt a call to action. She showed such inhumanity in her film so that we could strive for humanity in our everyday lives.



I realize now that the film was an attempt “to force [the audience] to think critically on societal issues with an objective morality, without romanticism or hatred of different concepts in their entirety, and by union of the most beneficial aspects of each system to create an objectively better world” (Hoffman, par. 7). However, I have to admit that my original reaction was not so comprehensive. Upon first seeing the movie I was devastated; I sat there with tears streaming down my face wondering why I needed to watch such graphic things. Some memories that I had been denying, things that I pretended never happened, were fighting their way up to the surface, and I blamed the movie for causing me so much pain. Clouded by anger and disgust, I was willing to accept the film’s criticism as an insult to women everywhere, pushing the feminist movement back for years to come. But more importantly, I was ready to sit in silence once more, thinking I could go back into my bubble, to lie to myself and say that things as horrible as this did not really happen to people and that it never happened to me. But then I was faced with a question, “What are you going to do: stay shocked or use those emotions to empower yourself to make change through your writing?” (Gottwald). So now I look at Swept Away with the new lens of social reform. I want to be a part of the conversation that Wertmuller has started. I went from seeing Swept Away as horribly evocative to grossly inspiring.     



It was not an easy feat to go from being absolutely disgusted by this film to using it as a catalyst for both personal and societal change. This issue became especially apparent during class discussions as the only things I would ever discuss were the scenes of graphic violence and rape. The nuances of the film were not lost on me; I understood the hypocrisy and sanctimony of it all. It was “incredibly ironic that the communist, who ostensibly fights for a classless society, sets up a diminutive sexist hierarchy as soon as the reigns are his to snap” (Hoffman, par. 5). I understood that through throwing away the shackles of society Gennarino and Rafaella could give into more primitive desires and live with no restrictions. I saw this, I truly did, but no matter what angle the class presented, my mind was ever fixated on the rape---but more so than that, the denial that rape had ever occurred. After days of class discussion, I had heard many people say that the scene in which Rafaella was chased, beaten, stripped, pinned down and eventually has sex with Gennarino (while unfortunate) was consensual because she technically agreed to it (Wertmuller, 01:06:00). Some argued that Rafaella was given a choice and did not have to sleep with Gennarino, but she did so repeatedly so it could not be counted as rape. The illusion of free will makes it so easy for people to deny that rape has occurred, but there is a danger to taking the word yes at face value and refusing to see everything that was manipulated in order to elicit that response and this manipulation has a name. It is called sexual coercion and it “is unwanted sexual activity that happens when you are pressured, tricked, threatened, or forced in a non-physical way” (Office on Women’s Health, par. 1). Rafaella faced the threat of starvation, physical abuse and even murder (Wertmuller, 01:32:00). When thinking about her options and the freedom she possessed in her situation, she tells Gennarino, “I feel like that rabbit you killed” (Wertmuller, 01:15:00). She saw herself as nothing more than prey that was hunted down and slain by a predator, a pitiful creature with no autonomy whatsoever. “Swept Away is not portraying the love between a tamed woman and the dominant man who puts her in her place; rather, it is a story about a cold mockery of love born from fear and abuse meant as a means of survival, not affection” (Knight, par. 2). Someone who has sex under these conditions does not do so out of genuine consent but out of a feeling of helplessness.



Wertmuller succeeded in her task to spur a homeostatic upset which forced me to come to terms with the reality of my own situation as well as the injustice of the world. Her film was powerful not only due to the vivid portrayal of issues of domination and sexual abuse but because of the social climate that she drew upon as a model for her story. Wertmuller created this film during the cinematic movement of Commedia all’taliana, “the genre [that] came in response to political unrest (legalization of divorce, abortion, etc.), poverty after WWII and other social issues…  as a way to talk about serious topics without creating something that felt like a lecture” (Garber, par. 2). Even though Wertmuller’s work served as a criticism of Italy in the Seventies, it also serves as an accurate commentary on today’s society.



One issue plaguing society that not only allows but encourages violent actions like those committed by Gennarino is the mentality of toxic masculinity. This idea that “men had to be tough, had to be strong, had to be courageous, dominating — no pain, no emotions, with the exception of anger — and definitely no fear; that men are in charge [and] women are not” (Porter 0:11)” is the reason sexual violence occurs. Toxic masculinity is not a natural mindset; it is a learned behavior, “a sturdy, poisonous branch on a tree built from social constructs” (Marking, par. 6) and it is constantly reinforced. While some men are taught to put masculinity “on the chopping block” as they know “its culture attempts to disguise dominance as benevolence… [that] has normalized values that debilitate not only men but women as well” (Gottwald, par. 9), these men are few and far between. The majority of “men are taught to… view [women] as property and the objects of men… an equation that equals violence against women” (Porter 09:20). This perception does not say that all men are doomed to commit such atrocities as the ones that were done to Rafaella or the ones that were done to me; it is to say that men are much more likely to commit these acts if society constantly encourages the mindset that men must dominate, regardless of the consequences. Toxic masculinity takes the blame off of men, as it is their right to control, and in some cases even shifts the blame onto women. When confronted with the horrifying reality of rape, some people will say things that echo the mentality that the woman “asked for it,” as “if these women [had] acted as society dictates a proper lady should, perhaps the men would not feel the need to break them down and build them back up again” (Rudegeair, par. 3). This “taming of the shrew” creates a vicious cycle of enablement, as men are encouraged to be sexually aggressive and submission, as women are taught to be meek and obedient.



Demanding social change and reformation is not enough when one does not have the complete knowledge of the systematic oppression that needs fixing. That is why, though it is shocking, it is important to “represent the decades of damage done by previous generations that lived in the shadow of ignorance all their lives. [So that] young people are forced to ask themselves the question: if it were up to me, how would I repair the broken heart of the world?” (Storms, par. 7). It is easy to stew in anger and point fingers at Wertmuller, to claim she is not a feminist and that her film is just an actualization of the male fantasy or a romanticization of rape (Ebert, par. 2). It is much harder to accept that Swept Away is something that we need to see in order to wake up and see how we have been socialized so that we may take back the narrative of sexual abuse. Wertmuller’s film is a testament of strength and shows that “victims have the ability to leave their abusers and regain their freedom, and that women do not have to be tethered down by men that wish to control them” (Knight, par. 8). Watching the film provides the audience a chance to shed light on the dark chasm of rape and to help pull people out of it; it is a chance to say “I am in pain and that’s okay; I need help and that’s okay. I don’t need to keep what happened to me a secret, and I don’t need to be ashamed. I was victimized but I refuse to be a victim, and I will not let this hold me back for the rest of my life” (Ramirez). This film gave me a realization that now is the time to take back my power and to live my life free from the fear of victimization. I will not be swept away by empty promises, but instead demand real change. Regardless of whether or not it is proper, I will be grossly inspired to find my voice and never let anyone take it away from me again.



Works Cited

Ebert, Roger. "Swept Away Movie Review (1976)". RogerEbert.com. Romano Cardarelli, 20

Feb. 1976. Web. 13 Apr. 2017.



Garber, Cerena. Class Discussion. 29 March 2019



Gottwald, Benny. “Putting Masculinity on the Chopping Block”. 06 February 2018.

https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2018/02/putting-masculinity-on-chopping-block.htm



Gottwald, Benny. Personal Communication. 11 March 2019.



Hoffman, Isaac. “Interpreting WALKABOUT and SWEPT AWAY”. 05 March 2017.

https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2017/03/interpreting-walkabout-and-swept-away.html



Knight, Lindsay. “Swept Away: An Illusion of Affection Stretched Too Thin”. 18 October 2018.

            https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2018/10/swept-away-illusion-of-affection.html



Marking, Alexis. “‘Boys Will Be Boys’ Until They Turn into Abusive Men”. 04 February 2019.

https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2019/02/boys-will-be-boys-until-they-turn-into.html



Office on Women’s Health. “Sexual Coercion”.

https://www.womenshealth.gov/relationships-and-safety/other-types/sexual-coercion



Porter, Tony. "A Call to Men." TEDX. TedX Women 2010, Washington DC. 30 Mar. 2017.

Lecture.



Ramirez, Sofie. Journal Entry. 27 March 2019.



Rudegeair, Anna. “The Same Old Story: Tamed Women and Their Misogynistic Male

Counterparts”. 28 February 2017.

            https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-same-old-story-tamed-women-and.html



Storms, Samantha. "Passion’s Dark Side: Roeg’s Walkabout vs Wertmüller’s Swept Away.” 08

December 2016.

https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2016/12/passions-dark-side-roegs-walkabout-vs_6.html



Wertmüller, Lina (Dir.). Swept Away. Perf. Giancarlo Giannini and Mariangela Melato. Romano

Cardarelli, 1974.

Friday, October 26, 2018

Screw Women, Man: Power Dynamics in “Swept Away” by Alexus Rogers



At the end of the day, women have caused every single problem known to man. Since the dawn of time, women have been the symbol for temptation and sin. Starting off with Eve tempting Adam and causing their expulsion from Paradise, women produce nothing but the downfall of mankind. In Lina Wertmüller’s film, Swept Away, the male protagonist blames the wealthy female, Rafaella, for everything wrong in his life. Serving as one of her personal waiters, Gennarino shoves her harsh insults into an overflowing bottle of fury. Stranded on an island with this catty spitfire of a woman, Gennarino finally lets loose all of his anger towards her. Giving her a piece of his mind, he explains why he despises her so: “When you were on the yacht like so many pigs lying in the sun with your tits hanging out... Like we were animals, not men. But I think you pigs knew. Every one of you pigs knew we were men not animals. You must have been very pleased turning us on so much that it was unbearable” (Wertmüller, 1:05:26-1:06:35). Gennarino’s sexual frustration is well deserved. To see a topless Rafaella and not be able to do anything about it can drive a man crazy, as it did in his case. A gorgeous woman such as herself taunts every man within viewing distance. However, “Gennarino hates the thing he’s attracted to” (Gordon).

Furthermore,
stranded on a deserted isle with no means to get her usual coffee and caviar, Rafaella must find a new source of food. Gennarino, our male lead, easily catches fish after fish. He gloatingly eats his crab while the starving Rafaella watches. Proving his superiority over her and his worth, Gennarino captures the heart of Rafaella. During my first time watching the film, I could see the devotion and admiration Rafaella held for Gennarino. Being able to ensnare food
and Rafaellathrough brute force, Gennarino encompasses the true stereotypical man. Masculinity at its finest is a bit on the sensitive side, and any threat must be immediately eliminated before masculinity becomes soft and weak. Despite constant beatings for her disobedience, “She becomes attracted to Gennarino’s abuse of power and begins to view it as a positive display of masculinity” (Farajollah, par. 5). For a woman such as herself, in an environment where she can do nothing but rely on the man to furnish the necessities, her instincts convince her to love Gennarino. Thus, she does, much to my contempt and desire for her to find her own way of providing for herself. Repugnance pumped through me as I watched the scene in which Rafaella begs Gennarino to “sodomize” her. In Roger Ebert’s review of the film he interprets her request as to telling the audience, “Woman is an essentially masochistic and submissive creature who likes nothing better than being swept off her feet by a strong and lustful male” (par. 5).

Before women can grow a sense to fight back, society teaches them how to surrender themselves to others. Every girl dreams of marriage and being tied down to someone. If she does not dream it up herself, then she is told to do so. In the words of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, “Because I am female, I am expected to aspire to marriage. I am expected to make my life choices, always keeping in mind that, marriage is the most important” (Adichie). Society mocks the women who do not marry. Kids will run up to her and yell “spinstress” while egging the scarily secluded woman’s house. The adults will ask her if she regrets not having any children. They will poke and prod her until she feels ashamed of not giving life to a woman’s purpose. The moment she was born, a woman has committed to offering up herself to the career of a happily married mother. Society has deemed it so, and Rafaella chose to let her eyes wander. Punishment must ensue. Gennarino makes sure of that, beating her for every sin she, or the rich, has enacted.
Moreover, brazen and combative women such as Rafaella must be tamed. She must fulfill her righteous duties in life. Not bearing children was her first mistake, and now she allowed Gennarino to catch her checking him out. Raising his fist towards her and raining down hell, he ensures she gets the message society has been screaming at her since the beginning: submit or suffer. Rafaella seemingly goes along with every one of his whims. Throughout the film she assures Gennarino of her love, going so far as to tell him, “I’ve never felt so good. I never want it to end. I love you” (Wertmüller, 1:26:00), when he suggests returning to the mainland. Needing proof that he is indeed manlier than her husband, Gennarino wants to chip away at Rafaella until she is nothing but his. In society’s eyes, the ultimate man would be able to do so without batting an eyelash. Proving his masculinity, Gennarino convinces her to go back to the mainland. Whilst there, we get to see the true nature of Rafaella.

Satisfyingly, Rafaella falls back into her old routine with her husband. When she throws Gennarino aside, I began to wander if she ever truly loved him. Being a romantic, I always want true love to prevail, yet I never got the sense that she had him in her heart. Moreover, I never felt her love towards her husband either, especially in the ending where she barely acknowledges him. When she glanced her husband’s way and then back at Gennarino’s longing stare for the last time, I realized she loves neither of them. The person she loves is herself. Her skill in surviving through any means necessary, including feigning devotion, emphasizes her self-love. In the scene right before she throws herself under Gennarino, she stares out at the waters, and in that moment I believe that she realized that she must fight back. As a woman, she does not need to prove masculinity or femininity. She must fight for herself. If she fights with her survival in mind, she can outsmart Gennarino and thrive on the island until she gets to the mainland. Wertmüller demonstrates the sophistication and decades long build-up of the feminist movement in Swept Away when she alludes to society’s viewing of women as their permanent scapegoat. Outsmarting mankind at their own game, women play into the submissive role while fighting to survive and thrive, just as Rafaella does with Gennarino. According to Roger Ebert, “She finds herself powerfully attracted to the situation; she's been spoiled so long, it's almost a relief to be ordered around” (par. 4), yet I would argue that she never truly does anything she has not convinced herself into doing. Everything she does is a rebellion against society and Gennarino. Wanting to remain in control, Rafaella implores Gennarino to sodomize her before he decides to do it himself. She goes above and beyond, and in doing so remains the one in control, mentally at least. Rafaella seduces not only Gennarino into believing that she truly loves him but the audience as well. Roger Ebert falls under her spell, dismissing her actions at the end as one of the mysterious things women just do sometimes (par. 8).

Adhering to the overarching theme, Rafaella’s case only goes to prove that when a man takes away a woman’s control and convinces her that she needs him in order to survive, then the woman will delude herself into having feelings for him. It helps that Gennarino is easy on the eyes. Rafaella was infatuated with Gennarino's aesthetic. Since the beginning, she was sexually charged for him. He was a forbidden fruit that she could not have because he was too dirty or too savage. Her sexual desire for him sparked a fire in her heart that she could not contain, especially when that fire was the only thing keeping her alive. In this sense, she saved herself by loving him. The fight or flight, freeze or fawn response is a normal human reaction to life-risking events. She used her instincts to her advantage. Her inborn intuition allowed her mind to fight on while her body feigned submission. Furthering the point, “Her mind was, in fact, merely colonized by the influence of Stockholm Syndrome” (Farajollah par. 4), which causes a captive to empathize with their captor in order to survive. Submission can give a captive the edge they need to last until rescue, which is something Rafaella takes advantage of. Without deluding him into the distraction of her body, Gennarino may have caught on to what she was doing. “She was smart enough to see the future and to think ahead, while Gennarino was stuck only seeing what was in front of him” (Gordon).

Throughout the film, Wertmüller brings forth examples of women resisting vassalage. From the opening scene of the film, Rafaella questioned society. She argued politics with the men and afterwards stayed up late to gamble while her husband slept. Embodying everything a woman should not be, Rafaella held true to her nature even in moments where the audience thought she gave up. Wertmüller, a fighter through and through, directs the movie through the lenses of the beguiled party. Movie reviewer Samantha Storms emphasized, “With this film, the negative light that is shed upon women such as Rafaella is not a symbol of inhibition, but an indication of forward movement and progression within a corrupted, subjugating culture” (par. 7). Societal expectations extort women into achieving nothing more than a person to be subjugated by the ambitious. Men are raised to be ambitious and to surmount anyone in the way of their success. Without eliminating these standards for each gender, there cannot be personal success and happiness for all. Wertmüller brings to light this aspect of our society through her film. She illustrates the battle between man and woman for dominance and equality respectively. The end goal for Rafaella is to survive in the wilderness and to be on or above the same playing field as men.
 


Works Cited

Ebert, Roger. Swept Away by an Unusual Destiny in the Blue Sea of August Movie
Review (1976) | Roger Ebert. RogerEbert.com.


Farajollah, Ariana. “An Abused Woman's Colonization and Declaration of
Independence.” Taking Giant Steps Press Blog, 7 June 2017.


Gordon, Paul Kirpal. 12 Mar. 2018. Class discussion.


Storms, Samantha. "Passion’s Dark Side: Roeg’s Walkabout vs Wertmüller’s Swept
Away.” Taking Giant Steps Press Blog, 08 Dec. 2016. Web.                                     

Wertmüller, Lina. Swept Away. Perf. Giancarlo Giannini and Mariangela Melato.
Medusa Distribuzione, 1974. YouTube. YouTube, LLC, 28 Aug. 2014. Web.


“We Should All Be Feminists.” Performance by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, TedX,
TedTalks, Dec. 2012.

Sunday, October 21, 2018

Tainted Roots: A Woman of East Indian Heritage Eyes “Swept Away” by Drashti Mehta




"You can be the servant for me because women were meant to serve men!" (Wertmüller 00:59:32). Creating controversy among its crowds at its initial release, Swept Away is known notoriously for offending feminist audiences. As the overwhelming tone of the patriarchy created its prominence in Lina Wertmüller’s film, I was reminded of the oppression that branches from my own ancestral roots. I was lucky enough to have the opportunity to grow up in the United States and not fall into the submissive patriarchal culture of India. However, as a bystander in my own culture, it dawned on me that the character of Raffaella was merely exposed to the oppressive patriarchal cultures many women endure worldwide.



For centuries, India followed a caste system, and despite their differences, the one thing they could all agree on was that women were inferior to men, a view that the male characters in Swept Away seem to be strongly in agreement with. According to an article from the from the Huffington Post, "The vast majority of Indians (64%) are of the view that the role of women in society is to become good mothers and wives and they should focus mainly on home" (par. 2). When a girl is born in India, she only has one purpose in life: to be trained to make the perfect wife and mother to her future husband and kids. From as young as seven-years-old in certain parts of India, girls spend their days with their mother learning to cook and clean, so they may be the perfect servants to their husbands in the future.



Wertmüller opens her film with Raffaella in a heated, politically based argument with her husband. As she expresses her anti-communist views and beliefs on abortion policies, her husband is shown immediately proposing his rebuttal in an attempt to belittle her opinions (Wertmüller 00:04:24). It is from this scene that Wertmüller manages to carry the theme of women's oppression throughout the film. Similar to Raffaella, women in India were often discouraged from speaking their minds, particularly in political matters. Furthermore, they were expected to adopt their husband's political beliefs after marriage. Raffaella's independence deteriorated as she became dependent on Gennarino much like the millions of Indian women that were forced into an arranged marriage.




Gennarino was quick to recognize that Raffaella wouldn't be able to survive without his assistance in obtaining food and put her to work. It was in the next few scenes that Raffaella’s life reflected the life of the average Indian woman. While many filmgoers and critics would argue that Gennarino was abusive towards Raffaella when he made statements such as, "My pants do get dirty and someone has to wash them" (Wertmüller 00:54:25), household labor is part of everyday life for many women in India. Additionally, I noticed in class that many of my peers began to feel bad for Raffaella when Gennarino demands chilled water and cooked fish (Wertmüller 01:04:57). Upon observing their negative reaction, I began to doubt my feminist qualities: was I a bad feminist for not being phased by Gennarino's demands for food, or had I simply come to view this as a societal norm through witnessing my grandmother perform these tasks on a day to day basis throughout my childhood? In many parts of India, it is not uncommon for the man, the financial provider in the family, to come home from work and rest while the wife prepares dinner. Furthermore, in smaller villages, the wife is expected to serve her husband and in-laws dinner and wait until they are finished before she seats herself.



As unfortunate as it may be, societal norms in India run deep with patriarchal characteristics. In many Hindu communities, the idea of "until death do us part" is nonexistent, for if the husband is to die first, the community expects the widow to partake in the practice of sati, a self-sacrifice ritual for the recently widowed woman. She commits suicide by burning herself with her husband, so they may be together in future lives (Kashgar, par 3).  Many women must additionally endure a virginity test on their wedding night. In this degrading practice, a newlywed couple is expected to consummate their marriage on a white towel while immediate family from both sides wait outside. If she does not bleed during intercourse, she is considered impure and her husband is allowed to divorce her for her impurities (BBC, par 4). Historically, a woman in India has never been seen as an individual; if she is not under the control of a man, she does not exist. Women in India were expected to abide by the rules set by society and do nothing more. However, it is knowledge of these practices that allows me to say that Raffaella is deeply feminist for sticking by her beliefs and opinions.




Film critic Roger Ebert criticizes the film for being anti-feminist: “Although Lina Wertmüller is a leftist, she is not, apparently, a feminist" (par 5). While many people may agree with Ebert's statement, I personally connected with a statement made by Samantha Storms in her analysis of Swept Away and Walkabout: “The negative light that is shed upon women such as Raffaella is not a symbol of inhibition, but an indication of forward movement and progression within a corrupted, subjugating culture” (par 6). Raffaella is the epitome of feminism.



At the moment in which Raffaella left Gennarino, I felt as though she symbolized freedom, reassuring women worldwide that the patriarchy only exists until we women fight for our rights and put an end to it. “Some women can escape social conformity and become conscious of the incredibly sexist, patriarchal society we live in. Others are trapped and are incapable of realizing their true identity because they are the product of someone else’s identity formation” (Solis, par 2). Wertmüller's film conveys the message of oppression through Raffaella.  This is not an anti-feminist film or the story of a damsel in distress; it is a statement. It's time for women to rise above the submissive culture they have been pushed into and receive the equality they deserve.

 
Author Drashti Mehta (left) and friend Manjari Parikh



Works Cited

Dutt, Rimin. “A Shocking 64% Of Indians Think Role of Women Is to Become Good Mothers and Wives: Survey.” Huffington Post India, Huffington Post India, 17 May 2017, www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/05/17/a-shocking-64-of-indians-think-role-of-women-is-to-become-good_a_22095588/.



Ebert, Roger. “Swept Away by an Unusual Destiny in the Blue Sea of August Movie Review
(1976),” https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/swept-away-by-an-unusual-destiny-in-the-blue-sea-of-august-1976



Farajollah, Ariana. “An Abused Woman’s Colonization and Declaration of Independence in Swept Away.” https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2017/06/an-abused-womans-colonization-and.html



Kashgar. “The Practice of Sati (Widow Burning).” Kashgar, kashgar.com.au/blogs/history/the-practice-of-sati-widow-burning.



Solis, Lola. "Is Feminism the New F Word? From Resistant to Responsive." 




Storms, Samantha. "Passion’s Dark Side: Roeg’s Walkabout vs Wertmüller’s Swept Away,”
https://giantstepspress.blogspot.com/2016/12/passions-dark-side-roegs-walkabout-vs6.html.



“The Fight to Ban a 'Humiliating' Virginity Test for Newlyweds.” BBC News, BBC, 1 Feb. 2018,
www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-42814681.



Wertmüller, Lina (Dir.). Swept Away. Perf. Giancarlo Giannini and Mariangela Melato. Romano

         Cardarelli, 1974.