Showing posts with label jazz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jazz. Show all posts

Thursday, July 15, 2021

Music Next by Marty Khan

 


Reprinted from Practice Magazine

 

As a management strategist and project developer for over 45 years, it has always been my methodology to plan for both a best-case and worst-case scenario, knowing that reality will fall somewhere in between.  With that approach in mind regarding our current Covid-inflicted crisis, I believe that we have to be prepared for the possibility that we may not emerge from under its scourge. If we do, great, but if we don’t … we need to be ready for that reality. And what are some of the worst-case scenarios we may be facing? In simplest terms that in the foreseeable future:

  • Music may not be performed in front of live audiences. 
  • Earning money through live musical performance may not be possible.
  • Getting together with groups of musicians in person may no longer be viable. 

I’m not writing this to establish a definitive position. To do so this essay would need to be far longer to support and explain everything I’m saying. Rather, my purpose is to stimulate consideration and discourse as we all struggle to come to terms with a dilemma that twelve months ago was inconceivable. That said…

As we all confront variations on the theme of WTF now? – let’s pause, pull back, and take a wide-angle view to consider the inception of our personal journeys in the pursuit of music. What is it that brings a musician to that decision – and even more than that, what is their ultimate goal? 

To help answer this difficult question, let’s pose other questions. Why does one practice yoga? Or meditate; watch a meaningful film; read an impactful book; study an interesting subject; work out at the gym … and so on and so on? The common answer to all of these things is the pursuit of self-improvement and personal growth. In some cases, there is a simple goal – lose weight, build muscle, equip oneself with the knowledge to interact with someone or something that means something to you. But on the higher level, the goal is to pursue transcendence and the profound … to uplift the soul and improve one’s being in pursuit of the miraculous. 

So who the hell decided that a primary purpose of pursuing music is to make money?

Since the development of artists’ careers and opportunities has been the focus of my professional work for well over 40 years, let’s just accept that purpose as a given – for the moment.

I read a very perceptive comment a few years back by someone who suggested that rather than lament the fact that people aren’t paying for music any longer, we should appreciate how fortunate we were to get away with it for almost 100 years, because prior to that nobody ever paid for music. While that is not entirely accurate, and he was primarily referring to sale of product, the statement is meaningful in a more general way.

Prior to its commercialization, music was generally heard in parks, town squares, royal courts, places of worship, and so on. I don’t know how much it cost to go to concerts, but considering what I was paying when I came up in the ‘60s and well into the ‘70s, it couldn’t have cost too much. Part of this was due to the exploitation of the artists, and I did my part to level the playing field in the ‘80s while still keeping the costs to the consumers quite reasonable. Our policy was always whatever the market will bear. But then came the Reagan years and what I generally have referred to ever since then as The Republicanization of the Performing Arts, leading to an artificial economy that would inevitably collapse.  However, that’s a different piece for another time.

In truth, the business of jazz has been disintegrating steadily for at least thirty years. Since my focus here is particularly upon the jazz form – the butt end of the arts economy – it would seem that there wasn’t a lot of room for things to get much worse, but they really did. I’ve written extensively about the economic plummet for over twenty years – the monolithic institutions, joined at the hip to the misguided invasion of the performing arts funding world; the emergence of the promoter/venue as star; the anointment of “influential” artists by institutions rather than emerging organically from the artists themselves; the post-Reagan perversion of the profit concept – have all led to a dysfunctional economy with a polarization of fees parallel to the same 1% vs. 99% imbalance that is crippling our society. 

A simple question: is the Covid crisis essentially a disastrous disruption of a viable business for the jazz artist? Let’s consider what I wrote to all my clients and many colleagues early last year…

… we should view the current reality not as a stumbling block to overcome in order to get back into the antiquated, ineffective and user-unfriendly realm that has now been shut off, but rather as an opportunity for a more viable, productive, and rewarding new reality that may now be within our reach.  

Think of this: prior to the crisis, how many artists were even close to supporting themselves through performing – either live or through recorded product? And then, how much work is entailed in doing a small tour, or even a solitary gig, where the primary goal is often just to not lose money. Consider the work that goes into:

  • Getting the interest of a presenter (or agent)
  • Securing the gig
  • Making sure it can be viable (support gigs, overhead, etc.)
  • Locking in the personnel
  • Rehearsing the group
  • Getting there and back
  • Making sure you get your money

It’s an exhausting process … is it really worth it? And is the real fulfillment in playing the music, or is it the response of the audience? And in all honesty, are either of those two goals achieved to a really satisfactory level. In any case, an important consideration: can you achieve the purpose of expression without an audience response? If you can, that would eliminate five of the seven bullet points above. It would also mean that making the music as an ensemble would be done for the love of it. And if you have the spiritual substance for it within yourselves – in the pursuit of Transcendence. If you don’t, then in pursuit of joy. You can still share it with an audience, just not in real time. Considering the array of challenges that real-time music-sharing can pose … would that really be such a bad thing?

 

After all, we all do things that are deeply meaningful and essential to us without the added element of doing it for commercial purposes. Can’t music fall into that same domain?

Which brings us back to the yoga comparison, along with the added element of how musicians actually make their living – outside the somewhat questionable, but not terribly uncommon, approach of having your life partner work to support your artistry.

Doesn’t teaching – privately or institutionally – occupy a lot of that terrain? For some of you, that is a calling. For others, it is a necessary application to allow you to pursue the music of your heart’s desire. For many, it may be both. Why are you teaching? Is it to produce more professionals to further glut an already overburdened economic environment? Or is it more for the love of music and the positive growth and development of the student?

So … consider the yoga industry. How many facilities, teachers, and students are involved in that pursuit? Isn’t there a common purpose – a set of values that every student essentially shares? Isn’t it also clear that the private teacher and/or institution is motivated by the combined purpose of enhancing the student’s experience and making money while doing it? 

Get where I’m going here? Not fully? OK, I understand. 

Music isn’t yoga. It can’t be done by anyone with a mat and the proper apparel. Who says? Music can be done by anyone with a voice, a bucket and stick, or lips that can whistle. With a minimal investment, it can be a harmonica, a recorder or a cheap electronic keyboard. But will it be of a worthwhile quality? It’s probably best for me not to offer an opinion about what is or isn’t good music here … and that really isn’t the point.

Let’s just go with this: Music in its highest form is a spiritual quest, which if achieved successfully is an incredibly enriching, life-affirming and profound contribution to the world and every individual in it. While yoga is … well … pretty much the same, no?  And it might make sense to check in with a true yogi about that, as I assume that there may be a good deal more of them than musicians who can properly claim that same level of mastery. 

Some of the most transcendent music I’ve ever heard has been made without commercial intent and where an audience was somewhat incidental: a shehnai player with drummers at a Sufi shrine in India; Pygmy music; Gospel choirs; a Senufo trumpet choir. I often enjoyed a trombone choir that used to play in midtown NYC – they were spectacular! One day during a break I spoke to the leader and told him that I would like to bring a certain record exec with a very open mind to hear them. He thanked me but said that this wasn’t why they played music … it was just for God. 

So … imagine a world in which you have a large number of minds and souls who can benefit by exposure to your teaching and who can be connected to the incredible legacy of the music’s past immortals; where you can create music with like-minded artists for the sheer pursuit of the miraculous (or on a less ambitious level, for a delightfully good time). Where your own pursuit of mastery is for the perfection of your own being rather than a competition for the meager rewards that await most professional musicians – or the lottery of becoming one of the anointed and/or a recipient of the occasional grant or one of the bigger (and highly arbitrary) awards.

Who loses by this shift in emphasis? 

  • The world of absurdly priced higher education that sells students on a six-figure investment that is highly unlikely to ever be recouped as a professional
  • Bloated monolithic institutions with ridiculous overheads fueled by millions of dollars of squandered contributions 
  • Self-important presenters who consider themselves stars of equal magnitude to the artists upon whom they bestow the rare gig
  • Arts funding professionals whose bloated salaries far outweigh the artist recipients as they foster trickle-down economics and combat self-empowerment in order to remain the new plantation
  • Instrument companies charging incredibly high prices for their products while thousands upon thousands of instruments remain locked up in the storerooms of public schools all over the country

This all may seem a bit simplistic, but it’s all in the quest for a certain brevity. There’s far more to say … and I will. That includes an answer to those who may say that I can’t address this because I’m not a musician. 

I’ll wrap this up by re-stating something I say above: We should view the current reality not as a stumbling block to overcome in order to get back into the antiquated, ineffective, and user-unfriendly realm that has now been shut off, but rather as an opportunity for a more viable, productive, and rewarding new reality that may now be within our reach.

Peace & A Love Supreme!

Marty Khan, arts management consultant, strategist, producer. problem solver, writer, educator and more than occasional pain in the ass to fools.
Executive Director of Outward Visions. Inc. www.outwardvisions.com



Thursday, June 3, 2021

Warren I. Smith Reflects on Barbra Streisand in his soon-to-be-released memoir by GSP, Crossing Borders & Playing with Pioneers: My Life in Music








When the chemistry is right, people remember. In 1964 I subbed now and then on Funny Girl, a Broadway show starring Barbra Streisand as Fanny Brice. It was her first big break, and she tore the house down night after night. When she quit the show a year later, she called me to play percussion on a national tour. Three years later, she broke into her acting career, winning a Best Actress Oscar for the film version of Funny Girl. I watched her skyrocket. That three-octave range—she had it all. And the chutzpah to cross borders and break new ground. 

A few months later, I got a call. I said yes to the tour. Her limousine driver picked me up and dropped me off at a small airport in New Jersey where her private jet awaited her and the band. Two seats to an aisle and a private bar. Just six musicians. She used local orchestras in each city. 

Along for the tour was her husband, actor Elliot Gould. Show business couples can go through a lot of changes, and I had the feeling they had played all the changes in their wedding song. Maybe his jet was in the repair shop, but he was not handling her success so well. I think he was used to getting a lot more attention. Actors have it tough. He couldn’t give up the jackass role he had cast himself in. 

We arrived in Florida, played a concert with a standing ovation and repaired to a first-class hotel. Barbra knew how to travel. Next day we’re back in her private jet headed for New Orleans. It was my first time in the city that started it all. Touring can be a grind and a half with missed transportation connections and accommodations or troubles with the venue. All that was nowhere to be seen. I had never been in a situation that was so luxurious in my life. 

Audiences loved Barbra. She was a fantastic musician and a model of dependable leadership. She was always on time, took everything seriously and it showed. It did not surprise me that she went in to garner awards for her film acting, writing and directing. Nor that she would succeed in film with such ballsy topics. As for her music, she outgrew the cabaret and show tunes of her early years and crossed over into rock and pop. She kept stretching. She brought that same intensity to her philanthropy work. Like the other greats I have worked with, Barbra always found a way to get it done. 






AFH. The Andrew Freedman Home, 2020, https://andrewfreedmanhome.org/events/.

Eng, Matthew. "The Greatest Star: How Barbra Streisand Broke Out Her Own Way in FUNNY GIRL." Tribeca, 4 Nov. 2020, https://tribecafilm.com/news/the-greatest-star-barbra-streisand-funny-girl-star-persona 



Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Warren I. Smith Reflects on Duke Ellington in his soon-to-be-released memoir by GSP, Crossing Borders & Playing with Pioneers: My Life in Music

 


Being on the road with a show was a benefit I had not even imagined. Some of the most inspiring experiences of my life came during these times, sometimes not even related to the show. For example, I was coming down one morning to the lobby of my hotel in Boston. I noticed the entrance in the lower lobby of a night club called Storyville. When I came back later, I saw a group of people downstairs so I went down to check it out. On the way I recognized Russell Procope and Jimmy Hamilton. It’s Duke’s band! I told them I was with the show next door. They invited me to come into the club. “We’re getting ready to rehearse. Would you like to come in and check it out?” What an opportunity!

Duke hadn’t arrived yet. All the cats were standing around the bar, smoking, drinking, never thinking of rehearsal, nonchalant. Then Duke entered and sat next to the piano, got comfortable and started playing a nice easy blues. The bassist Ernie Shephard reacted first, put down his drink and had his bass out of its cover before Duke finished his first chorus. When Ernie started, my idol Sam Woodyard, sharp as a switchblade, looked up. He was holding his cigarette and his drink both in his left hand while gesturing to make his point with the mighty right. I still can’t do that! As soon as Sam heard that bass line underneath Duke’s piano, he broke off immediately, got right up there and started laying down that impeccable time, and the shit was on now!

Everyone was focused on getting up there to get a piece of this groove. A sweet trumpet solo was followed by a clarinet chorus or three. Then I noticed a lone figure come striding across the stage, his tenor out ready to hit the downbeat at the top of the next chorus. Paul Gonsalves, the last to arrive, was ready. But the downbeat never came. Right on the one, Duke stood up and cut the band off with an emphatic sweep of his right hand. Absolute silence swept the room and Ellington said in a mellow tone, “Now, gentlemen, let’s look at the passage we kind of fumbled through last evening.”

How elegant, how cool could a bandleader possible be! It was a lesson in psychology as well as musicianship and discipline. After the show that night I got back in time to catch most of the last set. The effect of the rehearsal was evident in the performance. One of the trumpet players played a rhythm on the cowbell I had heard in the rehearsal, but this time some others picked up claves and maracas in the section and transported the audience to a Caribbean island. The band swung right on through the night as usual and left us dancing out of the club and back upstairs into the night.



Saturday, May 1, 2021

Peter Cherches discusses Tracks: Memoirs from a Life with Music, a new chapbook, with interviewer Kirpal Gordon




author Peter Cherches; photo credit: Elder Zamora

KIRPAL GORDON: Pete, since we last talked on the release of your book Lift Your Right Arm in November, 2013 (Taking Giant Steps: PETER CHERCHES: AN INTERVIEW WITH AN ULTRA-MINIMALIST (giantstepspress.blogspot.com), you've published two more books with Pelekinesis: Autobiography Without Words, a collection of short tongue-in-cheek vignettes from your Brooklyn childhood, and Whistler's Mother's Son, a collection of even shorter meta-fictive pieces. Both exemplify what Publishers Weekly noted about your work, namely that you are “one of the innovators of the short short story.” So what's going on in your new chapbook, Tracks: Memoirs from a Life with Music? 

 

 

PETER CHERCHES: Since you mentioned Autobiography Without Words, I’ll start there. I really hadn’t written much personal stuff for much of my writing career, and what little I did was thickly disguised. When I started food blogging in 2006, after a long hiatus (nearly 15 years) from writing (well, if you don't include a doctoral dissertation), I started writing about early food memories, and that led to more in the memoir form, and many of those pieces became part of that book. At the beginning of last year, just before Whistler’s Mother’s Son was about to be published, I started to think about a next writing project, possibly a break from fiction. Around that time I remembered poet Al Young’s series of musical memoirs, which I had read some years ago. I decided that would be fertile ground for me. I’d written a little about music before, but very little considering how central music has been to my life both as a listener and a performer. I wanted to make something personal of music, talk about the music that was the soundtrack to different times and ages, and animate in words the way that music becomes part of the fabric of our lives. I was able to write a lot in a pretty short period of time, especially after I was furloughed from my day job. I actually came up with enough for a full-length book, but I wasn’t satisfied enough with much of what I had written. I felt some of the pieces were forced, some redundant, and a number too descriptive of the music without enough of the personal connection. Then, last fall, Mark Givens, my publisher at Pelekinesis, announced that he was starting a new chapbook press, a joint venture with Dennis Callaci, the owner of the indie record label Shrimper. They were talking about doing books of 25 to 50 pages. I approached Mark with the proposal to do a selected group of musical memoirs, and he liked the idea. So I went through my manuscript, choose the pieces that were the strongest in different ways, about the joy of discovery, the sustenance of enthusiasms, and appreciation of the artists whose work becomes part of us. A few of the entries were adapted from tributes I had written to individual musicians, and some were the result of merging two pieces that really were talking about the same thing. Bamboo Dart Press decided to publish the book, though it broke their original length limit and ended up at about 65 pages.

 

KIRPAL GORDON: I noticed on the Contents page a series of links. For the technically challenged like myself, can you explain how to find your blog and the play list of tunes and the specific version that relates to each vignette?

 

PETER CHERCHES: The URL to the blog, where the playlists are hosted, is https://cherches-tracks.blogspot.com/. There are Spotify and YouTube playlists in the right sidebar of the page with recordings of all the songs that form the individual section titles in the book. It's a little different on a phone, and that's explained in the informational post. I figured that with the technology that's available it would be nice to have an easy reference for readers who want to hear the music. The Spotify playlist is called Peter Cherches: Tracks, so one could also search for that directly on Spotify.

 


KIRPAL GORDON: Regarding your phrase “joy of discovery,” it’s all over this memoir. As you make clear in your opening pieces, your two brothershow many years apart?were a great aid to the discovery process. Come on, now: you open with the Beatles’ “I Want to Hold Your Hand” when you are eight years old, jump “Milestones” with that first great Miles Davis band and then it’s the Fillmore East and Mountain’s masterpiece cover of the Jack Bruce-Pete Brown epic “Theme for an Imaginary Western” with that great vocal from Felix Pappalardi.

 

It’s not just that you have a wide-open ear; your discovery process is contagious. I followed your directions and played every song as I read the piece. What a find: Oliver Nelson’s “Stolen Moments” with bop lyrics (I didn’t know!). You’ve penned quite a moving tribute to Mark Murphy as “the quintessential jazz singer.”

 

PETER CHERCHES: "Contagious" is a word I like! 

 

My oldest brother, who was a true mentor, was 12 years my senior. My other brother, whose tastes are rather pedestrian, is eight years older. Our father died when I was two, so my brothers kind of filled in the gaps.

 

I decided to sequence the pieces chronologically according to when the songs made their impact on me, so the earlier pieces lean toward those big discoveries, whole bodies of music (e.g., my intro to classic blues via blues-rock), and the later ones become more specialized as my listening becomes more broadly informed. Then, right at the end I return to childhood, because I wanted to go out with the warm memory of my grandparents and my first exposure to Billie Holiday. The penultimate piece in the book, "Turn! Turn! Turn!," is the last one I wrote, and I used the refrain, "To everything there is a season," as a fulcrum to get back to childhood after talking about my long hiatus from writing and performance.

 

I used the Murphy piece to both pay tribute to him and to talk about jazz singing from my dual perspective as listener and singer. He wrote a number of original lyrics to jazz standards, by the way. Freddie Hubbard's "Red Clay" is another one. Murphy is a hero, but he's Dionysian to my Apollonian. If I wanted to write about a more subdued hero, I could have chosen Bill Henderson, who for me is the king of understated swing.

 

 

KIRPAL GORDON: Regarding your brothers, the older as a Rat Pack lover and Great American Songbook fan and the younger “whose tastes are rather pedestrian,” Tracks reveals you as a synthesizer of highbrow and low, listener of popular and avant-garde. It reads to me like you are seeking the authentic, the true and the original. Even when you’re turned on to blues performed by rock guys, your predilection is toward the existential and the roots lovers (Johnny Winter, for example, rather than Alvin Lee). Your “sustenance of enthusiasm and appreciation of the artists whose work becomes part of us,” as you phrased it, has everything to do with your long love affair with the music. You got it bad, and that’s great for the reader.

 

You really celebrate New York City, too. Hank Williams in a Park Slope bar’s jukebox! Your report on Rivbea is one of the most impressive appreciations of the Loft Era and where Sam Rivers was taking the music. Likewise, your eye on Butch Morris and his Conductions. You catch Steve Lacy with Mal Waldron. Most evocative of the best of the Big Apple.

 

 

PETER CHERCHES: I'm not the type who fetishizes the "authentic," but I'm interested in roots, connections, and directions, so I always want to find what's behind something that strikes me. For instance, I came to Brazilian music through bossa nova, and MPB artists like Milton Nascimento, but when I'd see them covering an old samba by Noel Rosa or Dorival Caymmi, I wanted to know the originals. I'm one of those people who has to know all the sidemen on the record, and who else they performed with.

 

I'm very proud of the piece on Rivbea. There are other reports on the music, but I think I gave a feeling of what it was like to be in the audience. I wrote a version of the Butch Morris piece on my blog the day I learned he passed away, and adapted it a bit. Add Lacy and I think you've got an interesting trio of "representative men" of avant-garde jazz.

 

 

KIRPAL GORDON: Tracks has you literally traveling the world in search of music. You flew to London to check out Brazilian music at the Royal Albert Hall. In search of samba you travelled to the city of Salvador in Bahia. What were your other stops in Brazil? Did you get to the opera house in Manaus? In India you’re searching for cassette tapes of U. Srinavas, the prodigy who would later work with John McLaughlin in Shakti, and in Moscow you’re listening to “Feelings.” You make pilgrimage to Memphis, Tennessee, but it’s to the W.C. Handy Museum, not Graceland.

 

 

PETER CHERCHES: I didn't get anywhere near Manaus. In Brazil I was mostly in Rio and Salvador, with a short visit to Ouro Preto, the historic gold town in Minas Gerais (Milton Nascimento's home state). I didn't actually search for U. Srinivas, he was recommended to me by a guy in a little cassette shop: "Only 12 years old!" This was well before he started working with John McLaughlin, and I eventually saw Remember Shakti in Montreal.

 

 

KIRPAL GORDON: The other killer ingredient in the memoir is the inside dope on the music’s composers, performers and venues as well as observations cultural, historical and personal. I’m glad you brought up your fantasia on your grandparents listening to Lady Day’s “I Cover the Waterfront” on their old Victrola. It’s the Gestalt-ing of the personal remembrance in the context of Billie Holiday’s unique genius that makes the vignette so poignant.

 

 

PETER CHERCHES:  I've always been a voracious reader of music history and biography, so I have that kind of info at the ready, but I still do research to check my own facts. As far as your observation on the Billie Holiday piece, that's exactly why I ended with it. I think it came together nicely to make a full circle back to childhood. 

 

 

KIRPAL GORDON: Having been there, I am particularly fascinated by your incident at Epidaurus, the ancient healing center of Aesculapius, where it is said that the cure for illness can be found in the contemplation of the beautiful. It sounds as if you took quite a giant step. Here's the entire piece called “Thelonious Monk, ‘Blue Monk’ (1952),” followed by a clip of you singing the tune in question:

 

            In college I was working toward becoming a playwright, studying with Jack Gelber, best known for the play The Connection. Most of my literature courses were in drama, from the English, Comparative Literature, and Classics departments, and I took a number of courses in the Theatre department too. My professor for history of theatre was Benito Ortolani, a scholar of classical Japanese theatre, with a secondary focus on Western antiquity. Ortolani was as Italian as they come. He had a thick accent and his hands were in constant motion. One day a student asked him, “Professor Ortolani, how many languages do you speak?” He replied, “Seven living-a ones and two dead-a ones.” In Ortolani’s class I learned about the surviving ancient Greek theatre at Epidaurus, a magical place that since then had always had a bookmark in my brain.

            It was close to 40 years later that I finally got to Greece. From Nafplio, a beautiful coastal city on The Peloponnese, I took a tour to Epidaurus.

            The theatre was built at the end of the 4th Century BCE, not long after the death of Euripides, whose plays were surely performed there, along with those of Aeschylus and Sophocles. It’s famous for its acoustics, a marvel of ancient engineering. Our tour guide pointed out that if you stand in the center, at ground level, and speak at a normal conversational volume, your words will be heard in even the highest, furthest seats—and the theatre seats about 14,000 spectators. “Try it,” she told us. A couple of people went down and spoke a few words. What was I going to do? Here I was at a veritable shrine of the theatre world, long a destination of desire for me; I certainly wasn’t going to say something banal like, “Hello, everybody!” Then I had a brainstorm.

            My life in the arts has taken a number of twists and turns. By my senior year in college, it became clear to me that short fiction, rather than drama, was my true métier as a writer. By the early eighties I was doing what people were calling performance art, mostly monologues based on my own texts. Then I started working with musicians, and that inspired me to get serious about singing, so I studied for about five years with a fabulous jazz singer, Nanette Natal. In 1987 I did my first concert as a jazz singer, at the New York alternative music space Roulette. For the show, I had written lyrics for 18 of Thelonious Monk’s compositions. Now I’d take the opportunity to consecrate Epidaurus with the music of Thelonious Monk. 

            So when my turn came I started singing my lyrics to “Blue Monk.” I had finished one chorus when a security guard came up to me, sternly wagging her finger, saying, “No singing!” I stopped, but I should have said, “And what the hell do you think the Greek chorus did?”

            I tell people that singing Monk at Epidaurus was the closest thing this atheist Jew has ever had to a “spiritual” experience. I hadn’t really sung for close to 20 years, and this inspired me to get back in the game.

Blue Monk, Cornelia Street Cafe, March 13, 2016 - YouTube

 

PETER CHERCHES: My visit to Epidaurus was both a fulfillment of an old dream and an unexpected renewal, and from there I returned to childhood!

 

 

KIRPAL GORDON: For me the strongest combination of song and tale is Anton Webern’s “Six Bagatelles for String Quartet (Op. 9).” I had my own wacky Gestalt moment. As the composition played on YouTube, I read your praise of Webern’s restraint and reliance on silence. I started to experience the music differently. My ears stopped efforting, and the “silent sections” filled in the “musical sections.” Then I read Schoenberg’s response to “Six Bagatelles” and realized it’s an Ars Poetica for Tracks: “Consider what moderation is required to express oneself so briefly. Every glance can be expanded into a poem, every sigh into a novel. But to express a novel in a single gesture, joy in a single breath—such concentration can only be present when there is a corresponding absence of self-indulgence.”

 

 

PETER CHERCHES: I think it might be the longest piece in the book, but I'm nonetheless pleased by how much I was able to squeeze into it. It may be my most fully formed exposition of my own working methods and concerns, at least regarding the influence of work in the other arts. As far as moderation is concerned, that's why the book is 65 pages instead of 200!

 

Tracks is available from Bamboo Dart Press at https://www.bamboodartpress.com/store/peter_cherches-tracks_memoirs_from_a_life_with_music.html

Peter Cherches w/ mic, Dave Hofstra on bass; photo credit: Scott Friedlander


Wednesday, January 27, 2021

An excerpt from “Under the Whitestone Bridge: Death at the Music Mansion Reunion” by Kirpal Gordon

 


Chapter 1

 

Playing the birthday concert for Faith, my mentor’s mentor, was a love supreme.

But if I knew that the concert’s aftermath would result in the felony arrest of my mentor Pavel Trzaska, I never would have entertained the idea of going. Nor convinced him to go. Nor convinced him that I, Orfea Goodnight, his twenty-two-year-old female writing apprentice and fellow musician, should come along on the journey from New Orleans to New York City.

From the second story bathroom window of Faith’s house, I watched red and blue colors flash like strobe lights from multiple police vehicles making the officials appear to be moving in slow motion. Under a dark orange moon that rose above Manhattan’s skyline in the west, police were cordoning off the side of the house with yellow NYPD tape just outside the parlor’s window where Faith spent much of her time. That’s where Gil and Red earlier in the evening had unveiled their birthday gift to her: a rocky grotto shaped in a semi-circle with a gurgling water feature. It was landscaped by Gil and the small wooden deer drinking at the pond’s edge was sculpted in wood by Red.

Now it was the scene of a crime.

At the end of a winding unpaved lane the Faith’s property sat hidden on three sides by Norway spruce, cedar of Lebanon and black pine. Bordering the East River near Boosters Beach, between the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge to the left and the Throgs Neck Bridge to the right, the house—what everyone calls the Music Mansion—was a sprawling three-story Victorian structure. With its wrap-around porch and large parlor that opened into a living room, it proved to be an excellent location for the Saturday night concert—at least until the last song when a gun shot rang out.

We heard a scream and then a splash.

Immediately, band members rushed to the grotto and pulled the victim’s bloody head out of the small rock-rimmed pond. I happened to be outside at the time talking on my cell phone with my boyfriend Rogelio, and I saw the whole thing go down.

My bandmates checked for a pulse, found none and called 911. A patrol car, which I later learned was sitting at Whitestone Park three blocks away, arrived two minutes later, took one look at what happened and called in. More police cars rolled up.

Watching the cops move around the crime scene showed me how clueless they were.

Compared to what I witnessed, all that they gathered from their interviews with the band and the audience was a four-word chronology: shot, scream, splash, death. How many variations would they consider: Was the victim shot dead by a bullet or frightened to death by getting shot at? Was the shot unrelated to the victim? What was that splash: the sound of a human head hitting the water or maybe just the victim’s foot or a rock that had been dislodged by the bullet? Was the bullet and the splash even related? As for who uttered the scream that followed the shot, was that the victim, the shooter or a third party caught by surprise chancing upon the scene? 

The evidence would not add up; it kept telling a different story.

I’m no expert on forensic science, but things appeared to be getting most foul, mon ami. When the medical examiners’ team patted down the victim, they found no entry wounds and no bullets. Instead, they found wads of cash in the pockets of his pants and shirt. I watched as they photographed and bagged five wallets, a collection of jewelry, a snub-nosed gun (possibly just fired) and a small vial (possibly of poison) from inside his overcoat.

Didn’t this new evidence suggest the alleged victim might also be a victimizer, likely to be found guilty of criminal trespass, theft, possible armed robbery and attempted assassination?

Back to shot-scream-splash-death: What if the victim had been rifling through people’s coats in the vestibule of the house, stashing the valuables in their coat and pockets, got discovered and called on it, ran at top speed out of the front door and down the steps, made a left, headed toward the water feature, turned their head, saw the gun in the hand of their pursuer and at the sound of its discharge simply dove for cover accidentally slipping on the wet mossy rocks and crushing their skull or drowning? That’s certainly not murder, but could be construed as involuntary manslaughter for the trigger-happy pursuer.

Instead, what if the fleeing victim/victimizer approached the water feature, turned their head, fired their snub-nosed gun at their pursuer, turned too quickly, lost their balance, screamed and made a splash by smashing their head into the pool or its rocky edge or its metal pipe? Involuntary manslaughter for the gardening team of Red and Gil would be a long shot. But suicide could be on the table just as easily as an accidental death.  

The slope was getting slippery, and until the arrival of the autopsy and toxicology reports, anything was possible. For example, was the alleged victim in bad health, inebriated or under the influence of drugs? In that case, merely running from a pursuer could give our victim a heart attack. To take it a turn darker and make everyone at the concert a suspect: Since poison is already in possible play and there’s food and drink everywhere, what if the victim had eaten or drank something intended to take their life? Such a possibility would prove pre-meditation and justify a claim of murder. But what if the victim had an allergy and died from eating something as common as peanuts or shellfish—then who’s to blame?

Nothing was clear and so much of the story seemed improvisational.

Who was the victim and who were their victims?

Little was said among the detectives, but the plot was thickening.

With their wall of lights turned up to superbright, the CSI unit inspected the grotto and sculpture. Sure enough, they found a bullet buried in the deer’s wooden left foot at water’s edge. When extracted with needle-nosed pliers and put it a plastic evidence bag, I got a bad feeling. Because the concert’s last song was a solo instrumental played by Hope, the police would soon realize that anyone else in the band—Smokey, Gil, Red, Liv, me or Pavi—could have slipped out of the parlor and onto the lawn or porch with time enough to shoot the escaping victim/victimizer at the grotto.

I’m not saying Pavi shot anyone, only that his return home was growing catastrophic.

The cops finished taking the last of the photos, put the dead body into a black bag, zipped it up and headed toward the flashing vehicles. Once the ambulance left the gray-pebbled driveway, I could see what had been hidden from my view: a blue squad car over whose trunk stood lanky, gray-haired, dumbfounded Pavi, spread eagled. New York’s Finest frisked him and handcuffed him, mirandized him and accordioned all six feet and three inches of him into the back seat.

Hope and Liv ran out from the porch.

“You got the wrong person,” Hope shouted.

“Come back and arrest us,” Liv shouted. “We did it.”

They failed to outrun the squad car which left for the police station.

From her room below me I heard Faith crying.

In the driveway under a taxus shrub Red and Gil were consoling a distraught gal who I had seen at the concert. I got the impression she was their old friend, but the news they shared did not seem good.

As for me, spying on everyone from the safe distance of the second-floor window, I felt less like an observer and more like an accomplice. I ought to have prevented this death from happening, and no matter how I tried to play it off, I knew I was responsible. I may only be Pavi’s sex-crazed, know-nothing writing apprentice and music nerd, but I had promised his girlfriend Cajun Karen in New Orleans that I would look after him. I owed it to her. Not only that, in a long line of writing apprentices he had mentored, I was only his second female apprentice—the first didn’t work out so well—and I felt a sisterly duty to those who might come after me.

I should add that I love the guy, you know, platonically.

I knew I had to do more than just watch the police haul his ass away. So I dashed down the stairs, collected what I thought of as relevant evidence of my own guilt, slipped into my blue Jetta and followed at a safe distance the caravan of civilian and law enforcement vehicles headed for the 109th Precinct in downtown Flushing.